首页> 外文OA文献 >Dating of the oldest continental foreland basin sediments in the Himalayan foreland basin.
【2h】

Dating of the oldest continental foreland basin sediments in the Himalayan foreland basin.

机译:喜马拉雅前陆盆地中最古老的大陆前陆盆地沉积物的年代。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A detailed knowledge of Himalayan development is important for our wider understanding of several global processes, ranging from models of plateau uplift to changes in oceanic chemistry and climate1, 2, 3, 4. Continental sediments 55 Myr old found in a foreland basin in Pakistan5 are, by more than 20 Myr, the oldest deposits thought to have been eroded from the Himalayan metamorphic mountain belt. This constraint on when erosion began has influenced models of the timing and diachrony of the India–Eurasia collision6, 7, 8, timing and mechanisms of exhumation9, 10 and uplift11, as well as our general understanding of foreland basin dynamics12. But the depositional age of these basin sediments was based on biostratigraphy from four intercalated marl units5. Here we present dates of 257 detrital grains of white mica from this succession, using the 40Ar–39Ar method, and find that the largest concentration of ages are at 36–40 Myr. These dates are incompatible with the biostratigraphy unless the mineral ages have been reset, a possibility that we reject on the basis of a number of lines of evidence. A more detailed mapping of this formation suggests that the marl units are structurally intercalated with the continental sediments and accordingly that biostratigraphy cannot be used to date the clastic succession. The oldest continental foreland basin sediments containing metamorphic detritus eroded from the Himalaya orogeny therefore seem to be at least 15–20 Myr younger than previously believed, and models based on the older age must be re-evaluated.
机译:对喜马拉雅山发展的详细了解对于我们更广泛地理解一些全球过程至关重要,从高原隆升模型到海洋化学和气候变化1、2、3、4不等。在巴基斯坦前陆盆地中发现的大陆沉积物55 Myr old是大约20迈尔,据认为最古老的沉积物已从喜马拉雅变质山地带侵蚀。这种对侵蚀何时开始的约束影响了印度-欧亚大陆碰撞的时间和历时模型6、7、8,掘尸的时间和机制9、10和隆升11,以及我们对前陆盆地动力学的一般理解12。但是,这些盆地沉积物的沉积年龄是基于四个插层泥灰岩单元的生物地层学5。在这里,我们使用40Ar–39Ar方法显示了该系列中257个碎屑白云母的日期,发现最大年龄集中在36–40 Myr。除非重新设定了矿物年龄,否则这些日期与生物地层学是不相容的,我们可能会根据许多证据拒绝这种日期。对这种形成的更详细的映射表明,泥灰岩单元在结构上与大陆沉积物夹层,因此不能使用生物地层学来确定碎屑演替的年代。因此,最古老的大陆前陆盆地沉积物中含有从喜马拉雅造山作用中侵蚀掉的变质碎屑,看来比以前认为的年龄年轻至少15–20 Myr,因此必须重新评估基于年龄的模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号